Intellectual property rights – the sole issue?

It never ceases to amaze me how wide the scope of intellectual property rights can be. The latest example this concerns Christian Loubourtin and his apparently fabulous shoes [you may not be surprised to learn that I don't actually own a pair]. 

Apparently one of the distinguishing marks of his shoes, apart from being ludicrously expensive [$395 for a pair of espadrilles anyone?], are his often used and highly distinctive red lacquered soles. And that’s the basis of the latest intellectual property litigation case taken out by him against the much larger fashion business, Yves Saint Laurent [YSL]. 

Mr Loubourtin’s intellectual property lawyer is arguing that that the distribution by YSL of high-fashion shoes with a red sole infringes his own trademark. The judge at the August New York hearing, however, did not support the claim that a colour could be trademarked in this way by a fashion designer. However the American intellectual property law firm representing Mr Loubourtin has indicated an intention to appeal the decision. 

The basis of Mr Loubourtin’s claim is apparently that it breaches a 2008 trademark, grunted by the US Patent and Trademark Office, on women’s shoes with a red outer sole. It’s generally accepted that fashion industry trademarks are used and enforceable when it comes to colour – but only when they are linked to a design e.g. the famous Burberry check.

It remains to be seen whether Mr Loubourtin’s will be successful in this sole issue [sorry!]

Posted in Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Litigation, Trademarks | Leave a comment

Snapping up those patents

Wow – tucked away in one of the big business stories of the last few weeks [Google’s purchase of Motorola Mobility for a massive $12.5 billion!] is the fact that as part of the purchase, Google will be taking over a huge number of patents – approximately 17,000 of them, with a further 7500 patents still pending. This comes on the back of the purchase by a group of 4 companies [which included Microsoft ]back in December of 880 patents and patent applications, owned by the struggling software firm Novell, for a mere $450m – the kind of small change that they probably have stuffed down the back of their sofa. Add in a brace of other patent purchases including Research in Motion [who, of course, make the ubiquitous Blackberry] who paid $4.5 billion for 6000 patents from the bankrupt Nortel telecom business. 

But what is actually going to mean? Various theories abound. Some have concluded that as a result, intellectual property rights will become increasingly valuable [and a good thing too, say our intellectual property solicitors]. An alternative theory is that it’s all down to the flawed American patent system, which forces businesses to cough up huge sums in protecting technology they have developed. Perhaps the truth actually involves a bit of both. 

What it does mean is that any business with innovative technology needs to make sure they have the right patent solicitors who can put appropriate  intellectual property rights protection in place – or they risk losing out entirely or facing lengthy and highly expensive IP litigation to try to recover what actually theirs.

Posted in Patent Law | Leave a comment

.xxx domains

I have worked with Patent Agents, Chapman Molony for a number of years and they always send out interesting bulletins.  This one has just arrived regarding the new .xxx domain names and how businesses can ensure that their valuable brands do not get caught up in the adult entertainment domain registrations.  Have a read and see what you think…..

The new .xxx top-level internet domain name will launch in September and be used by businesses involved in the adult entertainment industry. Over 500,000 expressions of interest in the new domain names were recorded during the first week of the pre-registration period that is currently running.  Businesses outside the adult entertainment industry will be able to protect their brands by taking advantage of the opportunity to opt out of the domain during a special 30-day ‘Sunrise B period’ before registration of .xxx domain names is opened up to the world. The opt-out effectively blocks the use of the chosen domain name at ICM Registry – the organisation in charge of administering .xxx domain names – meaning that it cannot then be used as a top-level domain name. So, for example, Tesco might choose to use the opt-out process to register tesco.xxx to prevent others registering its name in the new .xxx domain. The cost of opting out will be set by the individual domain name registrars who will handle Sunrise registrations and will be a one-off fee that covers indefinite blocking of that domain name. It is expected to be in the region of £100 to £200. 

 Trade mark owners may register an expression of interest in protecting their brands in the .xxx domain at http://domains.icmregistry.com, which we understand will result in brand owners receiving a notification advising them about the start of the appropriate Sunrise period.

More information may be found on the ICM Registry LLC website: http://www.xxxempt.com

Posted in Intellectual Property | Leave a comment

New Franchising Solicitor microsite

Following the recent launch of our dedicated Copyright Lawyers website, we have just launched a further specialist micro-site to add to our collection. Those of you who been following my blogs for sometime will know my enthusiasm for the whole concept of niche micro-sites. This one – the Franchising Solicitor – is dedicated to the work our highly experienced franchising solicitors carry out for both franchisees and franchisors. The whole basis of franchising, of course, is that by selling or buying a franchise, you are essentially licensing a series of intellectual property rights including any trade name or trademarks, the copyright in marketing material, patents, logo design rights and confidential know-how.

Our new site  is packed full of useful information and practical tips from our franchising lawyers on a variety of subjects which range from the critical role played by intellectual property rights when coming to franchise, and franchising disputes to checklists for or both buying into an existing franchise or launching a new franchised business.

Posted in Copyright Law, Intellectual Property, Patent Law, Trademarks | Tagged , | Leave a comment

European Commission- new Intellectual Property rights strategy

May 24, 2011 saw the publication by the European Commission of a comprehensive new strategy for EU intellectual property rights. The new strategy is intended to boost innovation in the European Union by modernizing the EU legal framework in line with technological advances technological changes, and in particular the growing importance of the web.

A series of short and long term intellectual property protections are set out in the strategy, dealing with a wide variety of areas ranging from counterfeiting to copyright protection, trademarks and patents.

In particular the European Commission is looking into the following; 

  • the possibility of creating a Europe wide copyright code – to allow for cross European copyright licensing
  • the introduction of a unified patent system throughout the EU[excluding Spain and Italy] – with a simplified procedure for granting patents
  • a unified system for patent litigation
  • a study of different national laws in so far as regulation of look-alike  products  and the protection of trade secrets 
Posted in Copyright Law, Intellectual Property, Patent Law, Trademarks | Leave a comment

US Patent Office- huge backlog

Sometimes government decisions simply stagger me – they beggar belief. The latest odd decision is not one from our own beloved coalition government but from the US. It appears that the recent budget deal for their Patent and Trademark Office has been cut. Firstly it seems old that their Patent Office is actually expected to collect more in application fees than they spend processing them – but the cut comes at a time when there is a massive backlog of patent applications – running at a staggering 700,000! It appears that, on average, inventors are kept waiting for a full 2 years before consideration of the application – and then a further 10 months before they discover whether or not their application is successful.  Apart from the obvious inefficiency of the system, surely now is a time, when economies worldwide are still only beginning to recover from the recession, to encourage entrepreneurial small businesses and particularly industrial innovation.

Protecting your intellectual property rights is always a good move – but there does appear to be a significant cost of doing so if you happen to be based in the US and want to file a patent.

Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Law | Tagged | Leave a comment

World IP day – 26 April 2011

Being the tip top IP lawyer that I am, I have just discovered (better late than never) that today is World Intellectual Property Day.  Obviously this is much more important than UK IP Day or even Salisbury IP Day.

So what, as one of my colleagues has just asked, do we have to do on World IP Day?

This year’s World Intellectual Property Day celebrates the role of design in the market-place, in society and in shaping the innovations of the future.  If you are interested in design, design law  and exploitation of design rights, then have a look at the excellent  IPO website and follow the numerous links to reveal a labyrinth of information and intellectual property advice!”

[Posted on behalf of Laura Trapnell]

Posted in Design Rights, Intellectual Property | Leave a comment

New Copyright Lawyers website

We have just launched the latest in our collection of specialist legal microsites – Copyright Lawyers, a sister web site to our existing Intellectual Property Lawyer site.

This new specialist website deals comprehensively with the specialist copyright service offered by our copyright solicitors and is full of practical tips and useful information on a wide range of UK copyright law issues ranging from copyright protection and copyright infringement, to how to avoid copyright problems when using an image and how to use copyright material legally.

So if you’re interested in protecting your copyright, or simply want to know how a copyright solicitor can help your business, pay a visit to our brand new site today.

Posted in Copyright Law | Leave a comment

Patent law – have the Americans got the right idea?

Why is America the world economic superpower? Whilst there are, of course, many reasons, one argument put forward is down to the strength of its innovation. Statistics show that Americans apparently make 4 times more applications for patents per head than us Europeans. The theory continues that US innovation is spurred on by their approach to filing patents – by making sure that inventors are rewarded by safeguarding the intellectual property rights springing out of their hard work.

 But there are also dissenting voices in the industry, with some patent lawyers  claiming that the Americans have simply been filing far too many patents and  that as a result businesses and inventors may in fact feel discouraged from creating innovation by the simple fact that there are far too many patents and inventors  risk expensive patent infringement litigation from Big Business. This line of argument continues that the US simply grants patents far too easily. There is a rather a wonderful name for companies which purchase huge numbers of obscure patents and then attack any potential infringer with expensive infringement lawsuits- the colourfully named “patent trolls”. Furthermore US Patent and Trademark Office statistics show that the delay in granting US patents has increased in the last 10 years from around 12 months to over 30 – at the same time that the backlog of unconsiderde applications has rocketed from around 350,000 to well over 700,000.

As a result the U.S. Senate passed a bill on March 8 which amounts to the hugest change to American patent law for 50 years -amongst other things it will, in general, line the US up with international patent practice in ensuring that a patent is granted to whoever files first. President Obama has praised this bill which has yet to pass in the House of Representatives. Will the bill become law and will it improve American patent practice? UK Patent Solicitors are waiting with baited breath.

Posted in Patent Law | Leave a comment

A single European patent ?

March 9 2011  saw 25 EU finance ministers agreeing to create a single European patent – which, apparently, will not require validation in each individual member country. The plan to change patent law thoughout the EU however still needs ratification in the European Parliament itself – but, if approved, should remedy a major failing in the single European market. This could make it much more attractive to apply for an EU patent – currently the paperwork required to file in separate countries means that it cost an incredible 15 times more to register a patent throughout Europe than it does in the US. The new system will make it much cheaper – but it will still cost a few times more to file throughout the EU than gain a single US patent.

Will this improve the protection of intellectual property rights throughout the EU? UK Patent Solicitors certainly hope so – though there is some suggestion that the national patent offices are still going to go ahead with issuing their own patents – which seems to rather undermine the whole idea of a single European Patent Office.

Posted in Commercial Intellectual Property, Patent Law | Leave a comment